Memperkuat kepemimpinan pelayan di sekolah vokasi swasta: pendekatan POP-SDM

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66599/wp.v2i1.13

Keywords:

Servant Leadership, Adversity Intelligence, Proactive Personality, Teamwork, Commitment Organization, Work Motivation, SITOREM analysis, POP-SDM

Abstract

Purpose. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan cara dan strategi untuk memperkuat kepemimpinan pelayan dengan menganalisis pengaruh variabel yang memiliki pengaruh positif dan dominan terhadap kepemimpinan pelayan. Method. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan POP-SDM (Modeling and Optimization of Strengthening Management Resources) dengan analisis SITOREM untuk menghasilkan solusi optimal dari solusi yang ada. Findings. Kepala Sekolah SMA Negeri di Kabupaten Bogor belum secara optimal menunjukkan kepemimpinan pelayan. Practical Implication. Hasil penelitian ini dapat dijadikan landasan praktis bagi pihak manajemen sekolah untuk merancang program pelatihan dan evaluasi kepala sekolah yang berfokus pada pengembangan kecerdasan menghadapi kesulitan, penguatan kerja sama tim, serta motivasi guna mewujudkan kepemimpinan pelayan yang optimal. Originality. Kepemimpinan pelayan ingin diperkuat, perlu dikembangkan kecerdasan menghadapi kesulitan, kepribadian proaktif, kerja tim, dan peningkatan komitmen terhadap organisasi, serta motivasi kerja.

 

Purpose. This study aims to produce ways and strategies to strengthen servant leadership by analyzing the influence of variables that have a positive and dominant influence on servant leadership. Method. This study uses the POP-SDM (Modeling and Optimization of Strengthening Management Resources) approach with SITOREM analysis to produce optimal solutions from existing solutions. Findings. Public High School Principals in Bogor Regency have not optimally demonstrated servant leadership. Practical Implications. The results of this study can be used as a practical basis for school management to design principal training and evaluation programs that focus on developing intelligence in facing difficulties, strengthening teamwork, and motivation to realize optimal servant leadership. Originality. Servant leadership wants to be strengthened, it is necessary to develop intelligence in facing difficulties, proactive personality, teamwork, and increased commitment to the organization, as well as work motivation.

 

References

Covey, S. R. (2004). The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. Free Press.

Crant, J. M., & Bateman, T. S. (2000). Charismatic leadership viewed from above: The impact of proactive personality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(1), 63–75.

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (3rd ed.). Pearson Education Merrill Prentice Hall.

DuBrin, A. J. (2013). Proactive Personality and Behavior for Individual and Organizational Productivity. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Focht, A., & Ponton, M. (2015). Identifying primary characteristics of servant leadership: Delphi study. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 9(1), 44–60.

George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (2012). Understanding and Managing Organizational Behavior (6th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., Donnelly, J. H. Jr., & Konopaske, R. (2012). Organizations: Behavior, Structure and Processes. McGraw-Hill.

Greenberg, J., & Baron, R. A. (2008). Behavior in Organizations. Pearson Prentice Hall.

Hardhienata, S. (2017). The development of scientific identification theory to conduct operation research in education management. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 166(1), 012007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/166/1/012007

Crossref

Hellriegel, D., & Slocum, J. W. Jr. (2011). Principles of Organizational Behavior (13th ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning.

Ivancevich, J. M., Konopaske, R., & Matteson, M. T. (2008). Organizational Behavior and Management. McGraw-Hill.

Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Kepala Sekolah/Madrasah.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 06 Tahun 2018 tentang Penugasan Guru sebagai Kepala Sekolah/Madrasah.

Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2010). Organizational Behavior. McGraw-Hill.

Luthans, F. (2006). Organizational Behavior (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Mitchell, T. R., & Larson, J. R. (2005). People in Organizations: An Introduction to Organizational Behavior. McGraw-Hill Book Co.

Pangma, R., Tayraukham, S., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2009). Causal factors influencing adversity quotient of twelfth grade and third-year vocational students. Journal of Social Science, 5(4), 466–470.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational Behavior. Pearson Education Ltd.

Santos, M. C. J. (2012). Assessing the effectiveness of the adapted adversity quotient program in special education school. International Referred Journal, 3(4), 13–23.

Schermerhorn, J. R. Jr., Hunt, J. G., Osborn, R. N., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2007). Organizational Behavior (11th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Sendjaya, S., Sarros, J. C., & Santora, J. C. (2008). Defining and measuring servant leadership behavior in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 45(2), 402–424.

Setyaningsih, S., & Hardhienata, S. (2019). Development of modeling and optimization method for strengthening management resources using a simple exploratory sequential analysis and sitorem analysis (POP-SDM). Opcion, 35(89), 1315-5216.

Shivaranjani. (2014). Adversity quotient: One stop solution to combat attrition rate of women in Indian IT sector. International Journal of Business and Administration Research Review, 1(5), 181–189.

Stone, A. G., Russell, R. F., & Patterson, K. (2004). Transformational versus servant leadership: A difference in leader focus. The Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 25(4), 349–361.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mix Methods). Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Tenner, A. R., & DeToro, I. J. (2002). Total Quality Management: Three Steps to Continuous Improvement. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc.

van Dierendonck, D. (2011). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1228–1261.

Wexley, K. N., & Yukl, G. A. (2005). Perilaku Organisasi dan Psikologi Perusahaan (M. Shobarudin, Penerj.). Rineka Cipta.

Wijaya, T. (2007). Hubungan adversity intelligence dengan intensi berwirausaha. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, 9(2), 117–127.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Hermawan, A. (2026). Memperkuat kepemimpinan pelayan di sekolah vokasi swasta: pendekatan POP-SDM. JURNAL VOCATIONAL EDUCATION POLICY, 1(1), 76–97. https://doi.org/10.66599/wp.v2i1.13

Issue

Section

Articles