Faktor implementasi dan integrasi augmented reality dalam pembelajaran: tinjauan sistematis

Authors

  • Kari Sulaiman Nasution Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta 55281,Indonesia
  • Ketut Ima Ismara Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta 55281,Indonesia
  • Galeh Nur Indriatno Putra Pratama Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta 55281,Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66599/wp.v1i1.33

Keywords:

Augmented Reality, Desain Instruksional, Inovasi Teknologi, Metode Pembelajaran, Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

Purpose. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perkembangan kajian Augmented Reality (AR) sebagai inovasi teknologi dalam pembelajaran, menjelaskan bentuk integrasi AR dengan metode pembelajaran, teori belajar, dan desain instruksional, serta mengidentifikasi faktor pendukung dan penghambat implementasinya berdasarkan literatur terdahulu. Method. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode Systematic Literature Review (SLR) dengan alur seleksi mengacu pada PRISMA. Data diperoleh melalui database Scopus dan sumber tambahan lain, dengan proses identifikasi awal sebanyak 104 record, kemudian diseleksi berdasarkan kriteria tahun publikasi, kualitas jurnal, ketersediaan abstrak, keteraksesan laporan, dan relevansi dengan fokus penelitian. Findings. Hasil akhir menunjukkan bahwa 42 laporan digunakan dalam review. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa AR telah berkembang dari sekadar media visual menjadi pendekatan pembelajaran visual-interaktif yang mendukung pengalaman belajar aktif, pemahaman konsep, interaksi sosial, refleksi, dan peningkatan self-efficacy. AR juga lebih efektif ketika diintegrasikan dengan teori belajar seperti Social Learning Theory, Experiential Learning Theory, konstruktivisme, serta desain instruksional yang sistematis. Practical  Implication. Faktor pendukung implementasi AR meliputi kualitas desain media, kesiapan guru, dukungan sekolah, infrastruktur, literasi digital, dan budaya kolaboratif. Sementara itu, hambatannya meliputi keterbatasan perangkat, kurangnya pelatihan, rendahnya kesiapan teknologi, dan perbedaan konteks sekolah. Originality. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa AR memiliki kontribusi penting sebagai inovasi teknologi sekaligus metode pembelajaran yang bermakna secara pedagogis.

 

Purpose. This study aims to analyze the development of Augmented Reality (AR) studies as a technological innovation in learning, explain the form of AR integration with learning methods, learning theories, and instructional design, and identify supporting and inhibiting factors for its implementation based on previous literature. Method. This study uses the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method with a selection process referring to PRISMA. Data were obtained through the Scopus database and other additional sources, with an initial identification process of 104 records, then selected based on the criteria of publication year, journal quality, abstract availability, report accessibility, and relevance to the research focus. Findings. The final results show that 42 reports were used in the review. The results show that AR has evolved from merely a visual medium into a visual-interactive learning approach that supports active learning experiences, conceptual understanding, social interaction, reflection, and increased self-efficacy. AR is also more effective when integrated with learning theories such as Social Learning Theory, Experiential Learning Theory, constructivism, and systematic instructional design. Practical Implications. Supporting factors for AR implementation include the quality of media design, teacher readiness, school support, infrastructure, digital literacy, and collaborative culture. Meanwhile, barriers include limited devices, lack of training, low technological readiness, and differences in school contexts. Originality. This study concludes that AR has a significant contribution as a technological innovation and a pedagogically meaningful learning method.

References

Abbasi, M. S., Anis, A., Billoo, S., Altamash, S., Ehsan, A. A., Omer, S. A., Ilhan, D., Khan, Z., Ahmed, N., Das, G., & Mosaddad, S. A. (2025). Exploring pedagogical approaches in crown preparation: a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of instructional videos and live demonstrations. BMC Medical Education, 25(1), 480. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07060-7

Crossref

Al Mukaimi, M., Alaskar, H., Yan, G., & Kaiser, K. (2026). Chemical characterization of dissolved organic matter in a hurricane-impacted estuary: linking chromophores, lignin phenols, amino acids and mass spectrometry-based compositions. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 329(November 2025), 109647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2025.109647

Crossref

AlAli, R. M., & Al-Barakat, A. A. (2024). Effectiveness of Augmented Reality Technology in Enhancing Primary School Students’ Acquisition of Creative Reading Skills. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 13(5), 344. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v13n5p344

Crossref

AlKahtani, R. N., Alnufaiy, B. M., Albaijan, R. S., Alnafaiy, S. M., Elfakhri, F. M., & Aljudaibi, S. M. (2025). Comparing the efficacy of live vs. video instructional demonstrations in dental education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education, 25(1), 108. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06672-3

Crossref

Berkovich, I. (2026). The dual increasing-reducing effects of principals’ digital instructional leadership on teacher burnout in online teaching mediated by teacher self-efficacy and collective efficacy. International Journal of Educational Management, 40(3), 444–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-01-2025-0037

Crossref

Can Kolac, U., Paksoy, A., & Akgün, D. (2024). Three-dimensional planning, navigation, patient-specific instrumentation and mixed reality in shoulder arthroplasty: a digital orthopedic renaissance. EFORT Open Reviews, 9(6), 517–527. https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-23-0200

Crossref

Carr, J. M., Schoephoerster, K., & Riegel, C. (2025). The impact of kinesthetic instructional strategies and manipulatives on fourth grader’s self-efficacy and self-confidence toward multiplication. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 27(3), 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2024.2343036

Crossref

Chen, S., & Rong, J. (2023). The Moderating Role of Teacher Collegiality in the Relationship Between Instructional Leadership and Teacher Self-Efficacy. Sage Open, 13(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231217884

Crossref

Cheng, Q., Zhou, X., Shu, L., & He, X. (2026). Effects of multicultural professional development and English learner percentage on STEM teachers’ instructional quality: A path analysis of the mediating role of teacher self-efficacy in multicultural classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 175(September 2024), 105438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2026.105438

Crossref

Dubron, K., Shaheen, E., Jacobs, R., Politis, C., & Willaert, R. (2025). Validation of mixed reality in planning orbital reconstruction with patient-specific implants. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 2087. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85154-4

Crossref

Elfira, Rasdiana, Fitrawati, Jasman, M. W., Reski, K., Anwar, A., & Enaldi. (2024). How does principal’s instructional leadership shape teacher performance mediated by teacher self-efficacy in Indonesian education context? Frontiers in Education, 9(November). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1401394

Crossref

Gümüş, S., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2025). The relationship between instructional leadership and teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: does school culture make a difference? School Leadership & Management, 45(5), 421–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2025.2585018

Crossref

Hao, X., & Fang, F. (2024). Learners’ speaking self-efficacy, self-efficacy sources and their relations in the traditional and flipped instructional modes. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 00(00), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2414051

Crossref

Herman, Herlina, Hasan, M., & Ahmar, A. S. (2025). Integrating social learning and experiential learning theories: a novel augmented reality approach to enhancing social skills in early childhood education. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2556889

Crossref

Heyder, A., Tometten, L., & Steinmayr, R. (2026). Teachers’ knowledge and misconceptions about diversity: Correlations with personal contact, attitudes, self‐efficacy and instructional practices. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 26(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.70083

Crossref

Hosseingholizadeh, R., Amrahi, A., & El-Farr, H. (2023). Instructional leadership, and teacher’s collective efficacy, commitment, and professional learning in primary schools: a mediation model. Professional Development in Education, 49(3), 518–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1850510

Crossref

Jerrim, J., Prieto-Latorre, C., Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O. D., & Shure, N. (2025). Teacher Self-Efficacy, Instructional Practice, and Student Outcomes: Evidence from the TALIS Video Study. American Educational Research Journal, 62(2), 378–413. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312241300265

Crossref

Jun, E. K., Lim, S., Seo, J., Lee, K. H., Lee, J. H., Lee, D., & Koh, J. C. (2023). Augmented Reality-Assisted Navigation System for Transforaminal Epidural Injection. Journal of Pain Research, Volume 16(March), 921–931. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S400955

Crossref

Juyani, A. K., Zarei, F., & Maasoumi, R. (2024). Efficacy of mobile-based educational intervention using Instructional Systems Design in promoting preventive behaviors for sexually transmitted infections among Iranian women: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 510. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18002-1

Crossref

Karakose, T., Kardas, A., Kanadlı, S., Tülübaş, T., & Yildirim, B. (2024). How Collective Efficacy Mediates the Association between Principal Instructional Leadership and Teacher Self-Efficacy: Findings from a Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling (MASEM) Study. Behavioral Sciences, 14(2), 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14020085

Crossref

Lai, Q., Alias, B. S., & A. Hamid, A. H. (2025). The Effect of Instructional Leadership on Job Satisfaction and Burnout in English Lecturers: The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy. Sage Open, 15(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251400980

Crossref

Leijen, Ä., Pedaste, M., Baucal, A., Poom-Valickis, K., & Lepp, L. (2024). What predicts instructional quality and commitments to teaching: self-efficacy, pedagogical knowledge or integration of the two? Frontiers in Psychology, 15(January), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1287313

Crossref

Li, Z., Liu, W., & Li, Q. (2024). How Distributed Leadership Affects Social and Emotional Competence in Adolescents: The Chain Mediating Role of Student-Centered Instructional Practices and Teacher Self-Efficacy. Behavioral Sciences, 14(2), 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14020133

Crossref

Liu, K., Chen, S., Wang, X., Ma, Z., & Shen, S. G. F. (2024). Utilization of facial fat grafting augmented reality guidance system in facial soft tissue defect reconstruction. Head & Face Medicine, 20(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-024-00445-x

Crossref

Malpique, A., Valcan, D., Pino-Pasternak, D., & Ledger, S. (2025). Teaching computer-based writing: primary teachers’ preparation, self-efficacy, and instructional practices. The Australian Educational Researcher, 52(6), 4555–4580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-025-00910-9

Crossref

Sadiqi, Z., Trigunarsyah, B., & Coffey, V. (2017). A framework for community participation in post-disaster housing reconstruction projects: A case of Afghanistan. International Journal of Project Management, 35(5), 900–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.11.008

Crossref

Schwiering, P., & Heyder, A. (2026). Experimental evidence on the effects of preservice teachers’ growth and fixed mindsets on teaching self-efficacy and anticipated instructional practices. Learning and Instruction, 102(January 2024), 102266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102266

Crossref

Shen, Y. (2024). Examining the efficacies of instructor‐designed instructional videos in flipped classrooms on student engagement and learning outcomes: An empirical study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(4), 1791–1805. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12987

Crossref

Siaw-Marfo, D., & Lumadi, M. (2025). Exploring the Influence of School Location on the Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Supervisors in Instructional Supervision in Public Basic Schools in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana. Africa Education Review, 21(1), 122–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2025.2504042

Crossref

Spangenberger, P., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Kruse, L., Geiger, S. M., Löde, V., Pole, L. K., & Nebel, S. (2025). A framework for serious game development as an instructional approach (SGDIA): proof-of-concept for students’ self-efficacy, values, and critical reflection. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00573-7

Crossref

Sunaguchi, N., Yuasa, T., Shimao, D., Huang, Z., Ichihara, S., Nishimura, R., Iwakoshi, A., Kim, J., Gupta, R., & Ando, M. (2024). Phase‐contrast visualization of human tissues using superimposed wavefront imaging of diffraction‐enhanced x‐rays. Medical Physics, 51(12), 9179–9193. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17336

Crossref

Ugwuanyi, C. S., Ezema, M. J., & Orji, E. I. (2023). Evaluating the Instructional Efficacies of Conceptual Change Models on Students’ Conceptual Change Achievement and Self-Efficacy in Particulate Nature Matter in Physics. Sage Open, 13(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231153851

Crossref

Usta, N., Özkaya, A., Karamık, G. A., & Akın, Y. (2026). Examining the infographic design instructional process in terms of prospective mathematics teachers’ infographic design proficiency, self‑efficacy, and abilities in evaluating student errors: A model proposal. PLOS One, 21(4), e0341380. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0341380

Crossref

Wang, M., Khodi, A., Curle, S., & Amiri, F. (2025). Voice as Pedagogy: Enhancing EMI Teachers’, Self-Efficacy, Instructional Clarity, and Vocal Health Literacy Through Integrated Voice Training Workshops. Journal of Voice, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.08.030

Crossref

Zhang, J., Ye, Z., Chen, S., & Sun, Q. (2025). Association between school climate, teachers’ self-efficacy, instructional practice, and perceived needs in professional development: a structural equation analysis using Shanghai TALIS 2018 data. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 13(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-025-00268-5

Crossref

Zhang, N., Siaw, Y.-L., & Jiang, N. (2025). The relationship between principal instructional leadership and teacher self-efficacy in student engagement and classroom management: a cross-sectional study in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 16(August), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1589958

Crossref

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Sulaiman Nasution, K., Ismara, K. I., & Putra Pratama, G. N. I. (2026). Faktor implementasi dan integrasi augmented reality dalam pembelajaran: tinjauan sistematis. JURNAL VOCATIONAL EDUCATION POLICY, 1(1), 51–75. https://doi.org/10.66599/wp.v1i1.33

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.